What’s the one thing you need to learn anything?

Engagement

*and we’re a little bit obsessed with it, having spent the last 15 years researching and mastering engagement across different sectors.

Our Learnify methodology is built on the Seventh Level Framework, originally developed by educators Bangert-Drowns and Pyke, and later adapted by Amanda Slavin. It gives us a powerful way to understand, measure, and elevate engagement.

Our Methodology

We’ve tested this approach across sectors and conducted a full research study validating its impact in educational settings. The result is a methodology that transforms content into connection and makes learning truly stick.

A pyramid diagram illustrating seven levels of engagement from bottom to top: 1. Disengagement, 2. Unsystematic Engagement, 3. Frustrated Engagement, 4. Structure Dependent Engagement, 5. Self-Regulated Interest, 6. Critical Engagement, 7. Literate Thinking. Each level includes a description of behaviors and characteristics associated with that stage.

— 7 Levels of Engagement Framework

Don’t just take our word for it…

In collaboration with the Clara Brown Entrepreneurial Academy (CBEA) in Aurora, CO, we conducted extensive research to measure and understand engagement in the classroom with The Seven Level Engagement Framework. The Future Frequency sought to better understand the role of engagement in Elementary/Primary education, specifically:

1. How (or if) it’s measured and monitored

​2. How to better equip both teachers and students with the tools and awareness needed to increase engagement.

We hypothesized that measuring engagement as a metric of success, rather than solely measuring learning outcomes, can transform the process of learning. Changing the way we measure success in learning will allow educators to utilize this understanding to further invest in programs that help students to be good learners and not just good students. This path has the potential to take us beyond outdated standardized tests as the only benchmark for how we measure what is working. From these insights, we developed the FREQUENCY-BOT questionnaire in collaboration with the teachers and students as a tool to understand and increase learning engagement.

Four colorful toy robot faces with googly eyes arranged in different facial expressions, each set against a pastel background.
    • Momentary time sampling of student behaviors across a semester

    • Weekly online surveys throughout the academic year

    • 12.5 hours of classroom video analyzed for time sampling

    • 886 total survey responses (3 questions/week)

    • Surveys conducted weekly for 23 weeks

    • Momentary time sampling of student behaviors across a semester

    • Weekly online surveys throughout the academic year

    • 12.5 hours of classroom video analyzed for time sampling

    • 886 total survey responses (3 questions/week)

    • Surveys conducted weekly for 23 weeks

    • One-on-one interviews to explore the “why” behind engagement

    • 11 in-depth teacher interviews

    • 6 in-depth student interviews

Colorful classroom display with posters explaining what a frequency bot says about its features, including its face, body, collar, nose, eyes, mouth, background, buttons, sticker, ears, and tongue, with cartoon robot images.

Key Insights

  • As the school year progressed, students demonstrated increased self-awareness of their engagement levels and learning preferences. Teachers shared that students have become more proactive in advocating for their own learning preferences, such as requesting to work in specific settings that suit their needs. Teachers spoke of seeing a transformation in students' perceptions of engagement in the classroom, shifting from mere compliance to deeper cognitive understanding by the end of the research program.

  • Teachers spoke of focusing on understanding students as whole individuals, recognizing that factors outside of the classroom can significantly influence engagement and academic performance. Teachers suggested that understanding how students learn outside the classroom, such as at home or during sports, appeared valuable for tailoring instruction and supporting their learning journey in the classroom. Teachers also highlighted how activities that help students discover their preferred conditions and ways of learning can have significant effects on both their desire and ability to learn.

  • At the beginning of the school year teachers expressed interest in measuring engagement in the classroom but felt there could be significant challenges in collecting such data. By the end of the year, teachers expressed dissatisfaction with the current methods of measuring success in elementary school students, which include test scores, grades, and standards-based grading. Teachers cited a disconnect between engagement and measuring student success, with some students being highly engaged in discussions but facing challenges when it comes to demonstrating their understanding in written form, which impacts their proficiency scores. The teachers’ desire to pay more attention to measuring engagement was accompanied by a sense of urgency that wasn’t present in the first round of interviews.